“There have to be consequences for participating in an attempted violent overthrow of the government, beyond sitting at home,” U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan said Monday, disregarding the fact that Mazzocco, a 37-year-old former loan officer from San Antonio, pleaded guilty to no such crime: actually, only a misdemeanor count of “parading, demonstrating, or picketing” in the Capitol for his participation on January 6th. This is the first time a judge has overruled the government’s sentencing recommendation and given a more severe sentence in a case involving the January 6 populist protests.
Populism appeals to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups. Populist leaders like Trump are convince people that they are on their side and against the establishment. Like the original populists, the new populists have gripes but lack the vision, will, and theoretical framework to transform the underlying capitalist relation at the root of their woes.
Who were the original American populists?
The story begins after 1864 in the aftermath of the Northern industrial-financial elite conquest of the Southern feudalists and the abolition of their formal slave system. Most people lived in the country until the early 20th Century, usually engaged in agriculture, and poor white farmers continued to be exploited while many African Americans had it even worse, an informal slave system called sharecropping.
The Populist movement was a revolt by these farmers in the South and Midwest against the Democratic and Republican Parties for ignoring their interests and difficulties. For over a decade, farmers were suffering from crop failures, falling prices, poor marketing, and lack of credit facilities. Many farmers were in debt to the Northern financial bourgeoisie due to a drought that affected the Midwest in the 1880s. At the same time, prices for Southern cotton dropped. These disasters, combined with resentment against monopolist railroads, money-lenders, grain-elevator owners, and other bourgeoisie with whom farmers did business, led farmers to organize.
As a result, two organizations came into existence during this period: the segregated National Farmers' Alliance and the Colored Farmers' Alliance. Although they came to win some significant regional victories, the alliances achieved little influence on a national scale. By the 1890s, agrarian reformers refocused their energies and organized the new Populist, or People's Party. The Party called upon the federal government to buffer economic depressions, regulate banks and corporations, and help farmers who were suffering hard times.
In 1892 the Populist presidential candidate, James B. Weaver, won 8.5% of the popular vote. The party elected several members to Congress, three governors, and hundreds of minor officials and legislators, nearly all in the Midwest. In the South, they challenged white supremacy by forming coalitions with black farmers in common cause. The coalitions won a number of elections in certain areas and captured the state of North Carolina in 1896 under the leadership of Marion Butler.
In Georgia, Tom Watson led the Populist revolt against the Democratic Party. Watson appealed to rural black voters by promising to respect their political and civil rights. Watson organized picnics, barbecues, and camp meetings and formed political clubs for blacks. But political cooperation did not mean socializing; blacks and whites sat separately when together. Yet that did not prevent them from cheering wildly when Watson spoke of their common plight: "You are made to hate each other because on that hatred is rested the keystone of the arch of financial despotism which enslaves you both. You are deceived and blinded because you do not see how this race antagonism perpetuates a monetary system that beggars you both. The colored tenant is in the same boat as the white tenant, the colored laborer with the white laborer and that the accident of color can make no difference in the interests of farmers, croppers and laborers."
Using fraud and violence, and rallying support by appealing to white supremacy, the Democrats held on to their power in Georgia and other Southern states. Many Democrats refused to endanger white supremacy by voting against the Democratic Party. In 1896 the Populists fused into the Democratic Party. With the defeat of Democratic presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan and with the Democrats successfully launching white unity campaigns in the South, the Populists gradually disappeared as a political force.
Today’s populists are a faint echo of the original movement, but animated by similar issues: the disaffected losers of Demopublican and Republicrat globalization who have gripes, but are primarily a petite bourgeois faction without significant influence outside the Republican organization. The ruling class has deployed carrots and sticks in dealing with them, along with the ideological weapons of their media, the latest rhetorical sleight of hand being the transformation of “parading” into “attempted violent overthrow of the government.”
Notes
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/matthew-mazzocco-sentencing-january-6-capitol-riot-1236619/